Flames Beyond Gettysburg certainly does deserve a place in the Gettysburg library of any serious judge of the facts underpinning the Gettysburg Campaign. Written by Scott L. Mingus, Sr., the book provides a well-written picture of the Confederate advance into Pennsylvania, beginning with Richard Ewell’s corps reaching Carlisle and ending with John Gordon’s brigade of Jubal Early’s division arriving at Wrightsville. Most importantly Mr. Mingus documents the rain fall that occurred over a period of several days during the Confederate march, and gives close details of the movements of the cavalry squadrons that accompanied Early and Ewell’s separate marches toward the Susquehanna; details important to any critical analysis of Lee’s objective in moving into Pennsylvania.


However, in bringing these important details into clear view, Mr. Mingus failed to seize the opportunity to use them to debunk the historical myth that General Lee’s intent, in carrying the war into Pennsylvania, was merely to threaten the seizure of Harrisburg while sweeping up as much moveable wealth of the State that he could, before returning to Virginia. 


The missed opportunity is manifest in Mr. Mingus’s choice of subtitle: “The Confederate Expedition to the Susquehanna River.” The word “expedition” is defined by Webster’s to mean “a sending forth of men on the march for some definite purpose.” As do historians and civil war writers generally, Mr. Mingus identifies the purpose of Lee’s march into Pennsylvania to be the capture of Harrisburg, writing that Lee meant to “push well beyond Maryland into the lush Pennsylvania farmlands, forcing the Army of the Potomac to come to [him]. [His] eyes were on targets of political and strategic importance, among them Harrisburg.”


Mingus offers the explanation that Lee was motivated by this purpose, because the “seizure of the capital of the North’s second most populous state could stimulate cries for a negotiated peace and increase European pressure on Washington.” Yet, when one uses common sense to analyze the objective strategic situation confronting Lee and the Confederacy, in June 1863, such an explanation is easily seen to be silly indeed.  For Vicksburg was about to fall to Grant’s siege and the Northern people could hardly be expected under such circumstance to cry for a negotiated peace; nor could the British government—the only foreign government that mattered—seriously be expected to exert the only meaningful “pressure” that counted, the British Navy, against Lincoln’s now effective blockade.


Mingus hints at another purpose Lee might have had in mind when in a throwaway sentence he writes, “Surely Hooker’s army would follow Lee. . . . If Lee was correct (in thinking this), he could, at the time and place of his choosing, [initiate] a pitched battle.” Shying away from analyzing the facts in light of this quite different purpose, the author concentrates the reader’s attention on the details of Early’s march from Cashtown to York and then Gordon’s march on to Wrightsville. In the process of this, for proof of Lee’s motive, the story relies on the writings that obscure the objective truth of the matter. For example, as do most historians writing about the campaign, the author, here, refers the reader to the message that time has preserved, sent by General Lee to Ewell on June 22, 1863, as Ewell was crossing the Potomac. “I think,” Lee wrote, “your best course will be toward the Susquehanna. . . If Harrisburg comes within your means, capture it.”


Apparently loath to separate from the pack of historians who cling to Lee’s phrase, the author means this shopworn citation to form the primary basis for proving the fact of Lee’s intent. Yet, given the undisputed reality of the matter all one can say about Lee’s statement is that it was intended to mslead the enemy in the event the courier carrying the message was seized in route to Ewell. For everyone must agree General Lee was not stupid. He had to know—as any reasonable person under the circumstances had to know—that it was impossible for Ewell’s corps, much less Lee’s whole army, to “capture” Harrisburg.


Why? Because, as Mr. Mingus must well know, the Susquehanna River, in June 1863, was impossible to cross without a bridge; and there certainly would not be a bridge by the time either Rodes’s division reached the river in front of Harrisburg, or Gordon’s brigade reached the river in front of Columbia! The historical depth charts for the river at these points is available to anyone who cares to read them.




t flank extending as far as Manchester. Which, of course, gave General Lee the oppportunity he was looking for, his eyes at all times being on the target of the enemy’s army.


Joe Ryan

Joe Ryan

Joe Ryan Original Works

@ AmericanCivilWar.com

About the author:
Joe Ryan is a Los Angeles trial lawyer who has traveled the route of the Army of Northern Virginia, from Richmond to Gettysburg several times.

Battle of Gettysburg
General Robert E. Lee
General JEB Stuart
General Jubal Early
Confederate Commanders
General Joseph Hooker
Union Generals
American Civil War Exhibits
State Battle Maps
Civil War Timeline
Women in the Civil War