| Subcategories |
 |
Mystery & Thrillers |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Careless in Red: A Novel
written by Elizabeth George
Studio : Harper
by Harper
Release Date : 2008-05-06
Publisher : Harper
Released : 2008-05-01
Availability : Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Number of Items : 1
EAN : 9780061160875
Avg. Customer Rating: (based on 90 reviews)
List Price : $27.95
Our Price : $12.59
|
|
| |
|
Product Description |
In her most eagerly anticipated novel yet, Elizabeth George brings back Scotland Yard's Thomas Lynley to investigate a ruthless crime. After the senseless murder of his wife, Detective Superintendent Thomas Lynley retreated to Cornwall, where he has spent six solitary weeks hiking the bleak and rugged coastline. But no matter how far he walks, no matter how exhausting his days, the painful memories of Helen's death do not diminish. On the forty-third day of his walk, at the base of a cliff, Lynley discovers the body of a young man who appears to have fallen to his death. The closest town, better known for its tourists and its surfing than its intrigue, seems an unlikely place for murder. However, it soon becomes apparent that a clever killer is indeed at work, and this time Lynley is not a detective but a witness and possibly a suspect. The head of the vastly understaffed local police department needs Lynley's help, though, especially when it comes to the mysterious, secretive woman whose cottage lies not far from where the body was discovered. But can Lynley let go of the past long enough to solve a most devious and carefully planned crime? |
| |
|
| |
|
summer reader |
|
I've read all of George's books. This one is the worst. It drags on and on to the point that it has become rather boring, and I'm only on Page 207. |
| |
|
Good to see you back, Tommy! |
After the misfire that was George's last novel - which I frankly couldn't even finish - it was a pleasure to sit down to "Careless in Red" and discover that one of my favorite book series has returned to form. While the Lynley and Havers characters have always been a bit contrived, it's easy to forget that in the sheer delight that comes from reading truly elegant writing wrapped around a complex but intriguing plot.
Of course, British policing is undergoing some radical changes thanks to its absurdly PC attitude towards criminals, and the reality of that isn't reflected in the procedures used by George's law enforcement characters. But again, it's easy enough to put what you read in the news aside in the service of a fine novel. And that's what Elizabeth George has produced here. |
| |
|
Too long and tedious |
|
600 pages! Elizabeth George is not Tolstoy. She desperately needs an editor with a CTL-x button. |
| |
|
care less and fed (up) |
|
I've read just over 100 pages since picking this up from the library today. It has more (useless) characters than War & Peace. I swore I would never BUY another of George's books after With No One As Witless, but now I won't even bother to carry any more home from the library. The Corny names make the plot very hard to follow, and I just can't get interested. I own all George's books in first edition, but never again. |
| |
|
Slipping a Bit |
I've been reading George for years and have devoured every one of her novels but, lately, it seems like they haven't quite been up to snuff with some of her earlier efforts. This novel was a real case in point.
One of the reasons why I feel that George is such a superb author is because of her very literary style. However, there is a point at which this particular style can be carried too far, and George is crossing that line more and more. This novel contains some very long and meandering passages that have absolutely no impact on the plot of the novel. The effect of this is to make it sound like George is rambling and that is not good. She waxes at length about the Cornish coastline and I found myself thinking, "Enough, I get it already!" In fact, there is such a propensity for doing this in the novel that I found that I was losing the plot threads. How can I keep up with all the characters when George abandons them frequently for paragraph after paragraph of superfluous prose?
The variety of characters in the novel is interesting but keeping track of all of them is rather daunting at times. I consider it a strength that George presents the reader with multiple points of view rather than having a narrower focus. To me, it is interesting to get into the heads of the people who are touched by the crime, to find out what impact said crime has on them. The down side of this style is that, naturally, some characters are more interesting than others. I didn't think there were any particularly weak characters in the book, per se, but I was definitely more interested in some of them than I was in others. I also felt that, at times, their stories were being dragged out rather too much so that the merest crumbs were being offered to the reader. This seemed to particularly be the case with the characters of Alan and Kerra.
Lynley is a character that I do enjoy but it seems like he's grown a bit stagnant. It seems almost like Helen's murder was a way to try to give him some new facets or something. I wasn't quite sure I bought the way that he totally fell apart and then seemed to put himself back together rather quickly. At times, Lynley feels more like a cipher than a person and I can't help but wonder if maybe George has reached the limits of what she can do with his character. He is certainly likable but he's not all the compelling.
The character who is compelling is Havers. I found myself growing positively cheerful when she finally made her appearance in the novel. In Havers George has created one of the most unique and diverse characters in contemporary fiction. Havers seems so alive that it wouldn't surprise me if she were to walk off the page, which is more than can be said for Lynley. The appearance of Havers is what really saved the novel for me in the end. Once she was in the picture, the dialog became more sparkling and witty and there was someone to liven up what seemed to be a rather dull cast of characters.
The mystery itself was less than compelling, perhaps because the reader never gets a real sense of the victim. He is more or less dismissed as a playboy and it's hard to take any real interest in him. George would have been better served by making the victim a more multi-dimensional character as it would have given his death greater impact. As it was, the mystery seemed less about the death itself and more about how it inconvenienced other characters and brought out the various and assorted secrets they had been attempting to conceal. The revelation of the perpetrator was meant to shock but the killer's identity wasn't all that well concealed and so by the time it was revealed, I had already figured it out. Perhaps if the book had been more focused it would have been a good reveal and the killer's motives would have been more compelling. As it was, the ending was frankly anticlimactic.
Hopefully George will narrow her focus in her next novel and hopefully there will be a whole lot more of Havers. I've never quite been able to put my finger on why George will concentrate more on characters like Lynley and the St. Jameses than she does on Havers. |
| |
|
|
|
